Case Study
TITLE: Remembering Neda
WHO: Advocates in Iran
WHERE: Tehran
WEBSITE: http://bit.ly/Kpcsu (wikipedia.org)
DESCRIPTION
Two short videos showing the death of Neda Agha-Soltan during Iran’s post- election protests attained worldwide attention in June 2009. One video (http://bit.ly/10FpwN) was shot by an anonymous man, and was then emailed to supporters and spread quickly to Facebook. The decision to email the video, rather than directly upload it, was made to protect the man who shot it, and also to circumvent the Iranian government’s censorship of the internet after the election. In addition, a second eyewitness video of Neda’s death (http://bit.ly/yyvoM) appeared on CNN within hours of being uploaded to YouTube. Because the videos were posted and spread so quickly, there was little time to consider the implications of such a rapid spread of unedited, first-hand footage. Writing at WITNESS, Priscila Néri asks “As concerned citizens, activists, and fellow human beings, how do we balance the need to ‘spread the word’ of what’s unfolding in Iran with the need to respect Neda’s dignity as she dies, as well as the grief of her family faced with such tragedy?” As people’s ability to capture eye-witness reports and live events with mobile phones and digital cameras increases, the video footage of Neda challenges us to decide how to sensitively and strategically publicise these accounts, especially in volatile and high-pressure moments. It also illustrates the danger people can be put in when they post and re-post footage online: advocates and protesters have since been detained by the government in Iran, and Twitter and Facebook were named in trials against them.
TOOLS USED: | Mobile phone cameras, email, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, blogs |
REACH: | Hundreds of thousands to millions of people worldwide. |
RESOURCES: | Access to data network on mobile phones and internet. |
TIME: | A few hours, from the footage being shot to when it was uploaded. A few more hours before it was broadcast on international media. |
LEVEL Of dIffICULTY: 2 out of 5
COST: N/A
LINkS TO LEARN MORE: New York Times blog: http://bit.ly/TqGnG
Global Voices: http://bit.ly/FK51f, http://bit.ly/LLAbx
WITNESS: http://bit.ly/gtyPz